|
Post by guru on Mar 26, 2012 19:03:40 GMT -4
Doesnt make much difference when the Governor is head of dcnr who run the stateforests and he presides over ALL of Pa. Including and not the least of which, dcnr and pgc. Lots of conflicts of interests there.
|
|
|
Post by dougell on Mar 29, 2012 13:06:29 GMT -4
Kickbacks from who?Why is there prefered regeneration when they control one variable and fence the deer out? Because deer simply magnify the cumulative effect of all those other things. Think Ive answered that for you once, twice....or three hundred times. lol. A deerless exclosure is a 100% UNNATURAL condition. Unless the goal is to have zero deer statewide and nothing but enviromental self severing by pointing to (as Latham started), I think we can flush the exclosure experimentation down the toilet once and for all. Yes,you've tried to point it out numerous times and everytime you have,you've been wrong.When you remove one variable(deer)and keep everything else constant(soil,rainfall,competitive species etc)it's easy to see that deer are the primary cause for the lack of regeneration.
|
|