|
Post by zodiakgsps on Jan 29, 2009 8:32:11 GMT -4
Cannot even describe this one it takes the cake though! These people are certifiable - I cannot believe anyone reading this could EVER take them seriously! www.peta.org/sea_kittens/about.asp
|
|
|
Post by stickman on Jan 29, 2009 8:49:04 GMT -4
They almost had an ad that was to air during superbowl but I think it got pulled, deemed too sexy.
|
|
|
Post by tbass on Jan 29, 2009 9:40:19 GMT -4
They almost had an ad that was to air during superbowl but I think it got pulled, deemed too sexy. I think strippers petitioned the NFL to cut it. After all, they get paid to get naked, wear body paint and roll around. The PETA ads are free. Im sure some of you have seen the ads I am referring to.
|
|
|
Post by jeffpahunter on Jan 29, 2009 10:12:10 GMT -4
The add PETA wanted aired during the Super Bowl was being discussed on one of the news channels last night and the commentator was interviewing one of the PETA spokeswomen about it. Her dodging of his questions was ridiculous and she kept referring to "fast food companies" that will have their adds aired and how bad for people their food is in comparison to what PETA suggests you should eat and how PETA was being discriminated against. She found every way possible to dodge about every question he asked her by either flat out ignoring it and changing the subject, giving a very partial response or trying to divert the blame & fault elsewhere. Another tactic she kept using was referring to how many times the video is being viewed on their web site and trying to twist this around by saying that it "must be popular with the public". I quickly got so sick of it I had to change the channel before I threw something at the TV and ruined it.
A few years back when we took our boys to see the circus in Wilkes Barre I "got into it" with a person from PETA that was there demonstrating. They are so ridiculous it's impossible to even attempt to reason with them.
|
|
|
Post by lockedhorns on Jan 29, 2009 19:49:06 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by zodiakgsps on Jan 30, 2009 18:31:26 GMT -4
LMAO!!! Guess they can justify spending the $$$ on an ad instead of saving their animals?? Seems a bit hypocritical to me per their agenda?? Shouldn't that money go to shelters, or how about people with pets facing the economic crunch & might need help to keep their pets??? Right up there with euthanizing 3/4 of the pets they take in to adopt out, rather than re-homing them. But calling fish "Sea Kittens" ?? Give me a break!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|